We are a fast-growing SaaS company in the EduTech space, operating mainly in Singapore, Vietnam, and Malaysia, with almost 2000 schools as customers. Our mission is to revolutionize early childhood education through technology and provide innovative, scalable solutions to our customers. With a team of 60 talented individuals, we are committed to transforming the way education is delivered in the Southeast Asian region and beyond.
Our DNA: What We Need From You
To thrive in this developing environment, you must live by our code:
- High Agency & Accountability: Don't Blame, Solve. Since we are still figuring things out, things will break. You spend zero energy pointing fingers and 100% on finding the cure. You Own it all as the Directly Responsible Individual.
- Simplicity with Depth: Design for ease, think with depth. You apply band-aids for immediate support, but you never lose sight of resolving the root cause for long-term stability.
- Sense of Urgency: Feel the heat. When a customer struggles, you own that pressure until the pain is gone.
- One LittleLives: Cover your team. Be a supporter, not an observer. Flag the blockers, then pass the ball.
About The Position
Title: Senior QA Lead (Stabilization Mission)
Location: Hanoi or Ho Chi Minh City
Department: Engineering
Reports to: Engineering Lead
The mission
- Eliminate recurring production incidents
- Rebuild regression foundations
- Design system-level quality controls
- Strengthen transactional and data integrity
- Turn QA from reactive to preventive
If you've stabilized a messy ERP, finance system, or workflow-heavy SaaS before this will feel familiar.
The Reality Check: We are looking for a battle-tested Senior QA Lead to lead a system stabilization mission.
- Our platform powers 10=600+ schools across multiple countries. It handles student lifecycle, operations, billing, payments, reporting, and complex data flows.
- We are past the early-stage chaos. Now we need to rebuild quality foundations properly.
- This is not a maintenance role. This is a stabilization leadership role.
What You Will Be Doing
Stop Production Incidents at the Root
- Identify systemic defect patterns
- Design invariant checks (data consistency, transaction integrity)
- Build reconciliation validation
- Prevent recurrence, not just detect bugs
Own End-to-End Platform Quality
- Student enrollment & lifecycle
- Class & attendance management
- Billing & payments
- Reporting & analytics
- Integrations & webhooks
- Data migration & legacy imports
- This role sees the whole system not just UI.
Hands-On Technical Validation
- Write SQL to validate data integrity
- Test transactional atomicity
- Verify idempotency of background jobs
- Test edge cases that break real operations
- Participate in root cause analysis during incidents
Elevate the QA Team
- Mentor and upgrade team capability
- Introduce structured test matrices
- Move QA from manual execution to system thinking
- Build quality metrics leadership can rely on
What We Are Looking For
- Having 5+ years QA experience
- Experience stabilizing a finance-heavy or workflow-heavy system
- Having strong understanding about below areas:
- Data consistency
- Transactional systems
- Complex state transitions
- Confidence reading logs, querying DBs, and challenging assumptions
- Experience designing regression automation, not just executing tests
Interview Process
Round 1: Role Challenge
Round 2: Team Interview with Engineering Lead and CPO
Role challenge - 4 hours
Question 1: What kind of reports/ validation system you will recommend to check financial data accuracy of the system.
Scenario 2: Payment gateway sends webhook twice due to timeout.
System behavior:
- First webhook: marks invoice paid
- Second webhook: creates another payment record
- Balance becomes negative
Questions:
- What is the architectural issue
- How would you test idempotency
- What invariant checks should exist
- What automated detection would you implement
Question 3: The system has had recurring finance incidents for 4 months.You are asked to design a 90-day stabilization plan.
Questions:
- What would you stop immediately
- What automated controls would you build first
- What metrics would you track weekly
- How would you define release readiness
